|
||
|
|
|
Poor security: Telnet, FTP and the rest
With billions of dollar of annual losses attributed to security breaches, organizations are under increasing pressure from auditors and shareholders to step up their security efforts. A 2007 study from a leading analyst company estimated the average cost per record to be in the range of $90 to $305 depending on the severity of the breach. FTP and Telnet are two protocols that find their origins back in the late 60's early 70's. Both suffer from several security issues but are still widely used by many organizations today because of their flexibility and their pervasiveness. Some of the security issues of FTP and Telnet are:
Connectivity Secure Server
Connectivity Secure Server offers organizations a secure replacement to Telnet and FTP. Based on the Secure Shell 2 protocol and equipped with the FIPS 140-2 validated Hummingbird Cryptographic Module, Connectivity Secure Server comes with a strong set of security features to protect your data and network:
Connectivity Secure Server comes with many functions and can be used for multiple purposes:
Quick Links
Unmatched Performances:
In January 2009, the Tolly Group, a 3rd party testing laboratory, released a report comparing the performance and TCO of Connectivity Secure Server and other solutions on the market.
From the report:
Here is the abstract of the report:"Open Text's Connectivity Secure Server outperformed secure shell servers from Attachmate Corp. and SSH Communications Security, delivering superior processing speed and scaling to support over 1,000 user downloads per server which enables it to deliver a cost of ownership unmatched by rival products tested."
"Open Text's Connectivity Secure Server consistently outperformed Attachmate Corp.'s Reflection for Secure IT Server and SSH Communications Security's SSH Tectia Server. In tests transferring a 36MB file from a server to a requesting client, Connectivity Secure Server completed the task 10X faster than SSH's Tectia Server and 24X faster than Attachmate's Reflection for Secure IT server."
Key findings: