Implicit Large Eddy Simulation: Computing Turbulent Fluid Dynamics

Chapter 3: Subgrid-Scale Modeling Issues and Approaches

Pierre Sagaut

3.1 Large Eddy Simulation: From Practice to Theory

3.1.1 LES: Statement of the problem

It is well known that the direct numerical simulation (DNS) of fully developed turbulent flows is far beyond the range of available supercomputers. Indeed, the computational effort scales like the cube of the Reynolds number for the very simple case of incompressible isotropic turbulence, showing that an increase by a factor of 1,000 in the computational cost will only permit a gain of a factor of about 10 in the Reynolds number. The actual possibilities are illustrated by the results obtained on a grid of 4096 3 points by Kaneda et al. (2003) simulating incompressible isotropic turbulence at Re ? = 1201 (where Re ? is the Reynolds number based on the Taylor microscale).

The main consequence is that to obtain results at high Reynolds number, all the dynamically active turbulent scales cannot be simulated at the same time: some must be discarded. But, because of the intrinsically nonlinear nature of the Navier Stokes equations, all turbulent scales are coupled in a dynamic way so that the effects of the discarded scales on the resolved scales must be taken into account to ensure the reliability of the results. This is achieved by augmenting the governing equations for the resolved scales to include new terms that represent the effects of the unresolved scales. The large eddy simulation (LES) technique computes the large scales (where the notion of large will be defined) of the...

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Scales and Balances
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.