Diffraction, Fourier Optics and Imaging

Chapter 19.5.2 - Large Number of Channels

19.5.2   Large Number of Channels

The major benefit of the removal of the harmonic images is the ability to increase the
possible number of channels. A number of cases with 64, 128, and 256 channels
were designed to study large number of channels. In the figure below, the number of


Figure 19.9. Harmonics withpartial randomsampling (M ¼ 100; L ¼ 16; d ¼ 15;l ¼ 0:4 nm; r ¼ 0:5).


Figure 19.10. The case of large number of channels (M ¼ 200; L ¼ 128;l ¼ 0:2 nm).


phased arrayed apertures, the number of channels, and the wavelength separation are
represented by M, L, and Δλ, respectively. Figure 19.10 shows the results for
M = 200, L = 128, and Δλ = 0:2 nm. The figure consists of two parts. The top
figure shows the demultiplexing properties under simultaneous multichannel
operation. In this figure, we observe that the nonuniformity among all the channels
are in the range of ~2 dB. It is also usual in the literature on WDM devices to
characterize the cross talk performance by specifying the single channel cross talk
figure under the worst case. The bottom figure is the normalized transmission
spectrum with respect to the applied wavelengths in the central output port. The



cross talk value is estimated to be 20 dB. It was observed that cross talk value
improves when more apertures (waveguides in the case of PHASARS) are used.


19.5.3  Finite-Sized Apertures

The theory for the case of finite-sized apertures yielding beams with Gaussian profile
was discussed in Section 19.4.2. Using Eq. (19.4-22), a number of simulations were
conducted. The results with 128 channels are shown in Figure 19.11. It is observed
that the results are quite acceptable.


19.5.4   The Method of Creating the Negative Phase

The experimental results up to this point are for the method of automatic zerocrossings.
Figure 19.12 shows an example with the method of creating the negative
of the phase of the total phasefront with 16 channels [Hu, Ersoy]. It is observed that
the results are equally valid as in the previous cases.


Figure 19.12. Sixteen-channel design with the method of creating the negative phase of the wave front.


Figure 19.13. Sixteen-channel design with phase errors (ERR ¼ 0:25p).


19.5.5   Error Tolerances


Phase errors are expected to be produced during fabrication. The phase error
tolerance was investigated by applying random phase error to each array aperture.
The random phase errors were approximated by uniform distribution in the range of
[-ERR, ERR] where ERR is the specified maximum error. As long as the maximum
error satisfies

 

the phasors point in similar direction so that there is positive contribution from each
aperture. Hence, satisfactory results are expected. This was confirmed by simulation
experiments. An example is shown in Figure 19.13, corresponding to ERR = 0.25π.


19.5.6   3-D Simulations

The 3-D method was investigated through simulations in a similar fashion [Hu and
Ersoy, 2002]. Figure 19.14 shows one example of focusing and demultiplexing on
the image plane (x-y plane at z = z0). The four wavelengths used were 1549.2,
1549.6, 1550, and 1550.4 nm, spaced by 0.4 nm (50 GHz). The array was generated
with 50 × 50 apertures on a 2 × 2 mm square plane. The diffraction order δx in the x-
direction was set to 5, while that in the y-direction, δy, was set to zero.

In Figure 19.14, part (a) shows demultiplexing on the image plane, and part (b) shows
the corresponding insertion loss on the output line (x-direction) on the same plane.

It is observed that a reasonably small value of diffraction order (δx ~ 5) is sufficient
to generate satisfactory results. This is significant since it indicates that manufacturing
in 3-D can indeed be achievable with current technology. A major advantage
in 3-D is that the number of apertures can be much larger as compared to 2-D.


Figure 19.14. An example of 3-D design with four wavelengths and exact phase generation.



19.5.7   Phase Quantization


In actual fabrication, phase is often quantized. The technology used decides the
number of quantization levels. Figure 19.15 shows the demultiplexing results with
four quantization levels, and otherwise the same parameters as in Figure 19.14. The
results are satisfactory.

 

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Optical Lenses
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.