A literature survey was conducted to find publications on the subject of predicting room/corner test performance based on material data from small-scale fire test methods. As a result of the search, 16 methods were identified. A distinction can be made between three types of methods: room fire simulation models, analytical methods, and statistical correlations. Models predict how the room environment varies as a function of time, and how this affects flame spread over the walls and ceiling of the compartment. Analytical methods predict fire growth, but do not simulate the room environment. Statistical correlations express a relationship between a particular aspect of room/corner test performance, such as the occurrence of or the time to flashover, and small-scale fire test data. The 16 methods are briefly described in this paper. The model developed by Quintiere and its variants capture the major physical phenomena affecting fire growth, and appear to be the most accurate and versatile methods available. Recent efforts to use CFD codes for simulating the room/corner test are very promising and indicate that this may soon be the preferred approach.

INTRODUCTION

Room/corner tests have been used for more than two decades to assess the fire performance of wall and ceiling linings in a realistic configuration and scale. Several standard room/corner test protocols are now available, and are specified in codes and regulations for qualifying interior finishes. For example,...