Diffraction, Fourier Optics and Imaging

Chapter 19.2 - Array Waveguide Grating

19.2   ARRAY WAVEGUIDE GRATING

The AWG-based multiplexers and demultiplexers are essentially the same.
Depending on the direction of light wave propagation, the device can be used as
either a multiplexer or a demultiplexer due to the reciprocity principle. For the sake
of simplicity, the demultiplexer operation is discussed here.

The AWG consists of two arrays of input/output waveguides, two focusing slab
regions, and the array grating waveguides. This is illustrated in Figure 19.1. A single
fiber containing the multiwavelength input is connected to the array of input
waveguides. The input multiwavelength signal is evenly split among the input
waveguides, and the signal propagates through the input waveguides to reach the
input focusing slab region. The light wave travels through the focusing slab and is
coupled into the array grating waveguides. A linear phase shift occurs in the light
wave traveling through each array grating waveguide due to the path length
differences between the array grating waveguides.

The light wave is subsequently coupled into the output focusing slab, in which the
multiwavelength input signal is split into different beams according to their wavelengths
due to diffraction and wavelength dispersion. The length of the array waveguides
and the path length difference ΔL between two adjacent waveguides are chosen in
such a way that the phase retardation for the light wave of the center wavelength


Figure 19.1. Schematic for the arrayed waveguide grating device [Courtesy of Okamoto].

 

passing through every array waveguide is 2πm, m being the diffraction order equal
to an integer. The phase retardations of the light waves of wavelengths other than
the center wavelength are different from the phase retardation of the center wavelength.
As a result, a unique phase front is created for each wavelength component
which is then focused to a different position on the output side of the output focusing
slab region. Each wavelength component is then fed into an output waveguide.

An approximate analysis of the demultiplexing operation is discussed below. The
definitions in the input and output focusing slab regions are as follows:

Input focusing slab region
:

D1: the spacing between the ends of adjacent waveguides,
d1: the spacing between the ends of adjacent waveguides on the output side,
x1: distance measured from the center of the input side,
f1: the radius of the output curvature.

Output focusing slab region:

d: the spacing between the ends of adjacent waveguides connected to the array
    waveguides,
D: the spacing between the ends of adjacent waveguides connected to the output
    waveguides,
f: the radius of the output curvature.

We reiterate that the path difference between two adjacent waveguides is ΔL, and
the corresponding phase retardation is 2πm with respect to the center wavelength.

Consider the light beams passing through the ith and (i-1)th array waveguides. In
order for the two light beams to interfere constructively, their phase difference
should be a multiple of 2π as they reach the output side of the focusing slab region.
The condition for constructive interference is then given by

 

where βs and βc denote the propagation constants (wave numbers) in the slab region
and the array waveguide, respectively, m is the diffraction order, λ0 is the center
wavelength of the multiple wavelength input, and Lc is the minimum array
waveguide length. Subtracting common terms from Eq. (19.2-1), we obtain

 

When the condition

 

is satisfied for λ0, the light input position x1 and the output position x satisfy the
condition

 

The above equation means that when light is coupled into the input position x1, the
output position x is determined by Eq. (19.2-4).

The path length difference ΔL can be shown to be

 

The spatial separation (free spectral range) of the mth and (m + l)th
focused beams for the same wavelength can be derived from Eq. (19.2-2) as
[Okamoto]

 

The number of available wavelength channels Nch is obtained by dividing XFSR by
the output waveguide separation D as

 

In practice, achieving the layout of the waveguides in a planar geometry such that
the length difference between two waveguides is is not a trivial task. Professional
computer-aided design programs are usually used for this purpose. An example is
shown in Figure 19.2 in which the BeamPROP software package by Rsoft Inc. was
used to carry out the design [Lu, Ersoy].

Two examples of the results obtained with PHASAR simulation at a center
wavelength of 1.55 μ and channel spacing of 0.8 μ are shown in Figures 19.3 and
19.4 to illustrate how the number of channels are limited [Lu and Ersoy et al.,
2003]. In Figure 19.3, there are 16 channels, and the second order channels on
either side of the central channels do not overlap with the central channels. On
the other hand, in Figure 19.4, there are 64 channels, and the second order
channels on either side of the central channels start overlapping with the central
channels. In this particular case, the number of channels could not be increased
any further. Currently, PHASAR devices being marketed have of the order of 40
channels.

 

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Optical Lenses
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.