Process Modelling for Control: A Unified Framework Using Standard Black-box Techniques

5.2: Model Validation Using Prediction-error Identification

5.2 Model Validation Using Prediction-error Identification

Let us assume that the true process is the SISO LTI system described by (2.79)


where, as usual, G 0( z) and H 0( z) are unknown discrete-time rational transfer functions, with G 0( z) strictly proper and H 0( z) stable and inversely stable. We shall further assume that ?( t) is zero-mean wide-sense stationary noise, e( t) being a white noise signal. Prediction-error identification theory requires no additional assumptions on the noise ?( t); in particular ?( t) does not need to be Gaussian: see (Ljung, 1999).

A polynomial representation of G 0( z) is given by


where

  • d is the dead time of the process;

  • is the vector containing the parameters of the true system;

  • is a row vector of size q;

  • Z n( z) = [0 0 z ?1 z ?2 z ? m] is a row vector of size q.

Example Remark

If the true system is not LTI, the theoretical derivations of this chapter are no longer valid. Indeed, they are based on the identification of an unbiased estimate of the system using prediction-error identification and on the construction, from the covariance of this estimate, of a frequency-domain uncertainty region containing the true system. The presence of a small amount of nonlinearities will however probably not destroy the ground...

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Globe Valves
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.