| PREFACE
The book is divided into nine chapters. Except for the first two introductory chapters, each chapter is independent and restricted to a particular subject to be studied. To the best of the author s knowledge, the most appropriate theories have been chosen to model the specific topic of VCSELs. In Chapters 3 and 4, theoretical models have been developed to analyze the modal profile and polarization, respectively, of VCSELs. The most popular structure of VCSELs is a cylindrical symmetric cavity, which is assumed in the derivation of the models. In addition, this configuration of VCSELs allows investigation of the modal profile and polarization separately such that the complexity of theoretical models can be reduced. In Chapter 3, different methods of solving the wave equation for the modal profile of VCSELs are discussed in detail. The reader can choose the most appropriate model with the required speed and accuracy to analyze the problems. In Chapter 4, two- and four-level models are described to study the polarization properties of the fundamental transverse mode. These simplified models can evaluate the dominant factors that control the polarization properties of VCSELs. It must be noted that the investigation of VCSELs using cold cavity approximations is not realistic. This is so because most of the measurable data, such as threshold current, lasing wavelength, slope efficiency, and output power, all depend on the operating temperature of lasers. Furthermore, the optical behavior of VCSELs is affected by thermal lensing (i.e., self-focusing of transverse modes into the core region of the active layer). Therefore, the thermal properties of VCSELs are investigated in Chapter 5. The method of effective temperature using a simple rate equation model is presented. Effective thermal conductivity and heat generation rate are also derived. The objective in defining effective temperature is to simplify the study by using a rate equation model so that the computational efficiency can be improved. However, this approach will not provide detailed information on heat distribution. Detailed heat distribution inside the laser cavity is studied by solving the heat equation numerically. In this case, the influence of thermal lensing on the optical field profile can be evaluated. Spatial hole burning of carrier concentration also has significant influence on the modal profile of VCSELs. Therefore, Chapter 6 describes the use of a simple rate equation to evaluate the distribution of carrier concentration inside the active region. In this case, self-consistent calculation of optical gain and carrier concentration (i.e., self-consistent calculation of the Poisson and Schrödinger equations) is ignored to simplify the calculation. Different methods for approximating the nonuniform distribution of carrier concentration are also discussed. On the other hand, nonuniform distributions of electric potential and current are required as the input parameters to calculate the heat distribution inside the laser cavity. They have to be solved numerically using the Poisson and continuity equations simultaneously with appropriate boundary conditions. The electric potential across the active layer and the corresponding carrier concentration can be linked together by a simple diode equation. This is so because the simplified relation between optical gain and carrier concentration has been assumed. The self-consistent calculation of optical field, heat, and electrical characteristics of VCSELs is also described in Chapter 6. The dynamic response of VCSELs is analyzed in Chapter 7. Preliminary investigation of the dynamic response of VCSELs using a simple rate equation model is described. Hence, the time variation of carrier concentration and photon density inside the active layer can be calculated. Furthermore, detailed analysis of optical fields can be considered using the beam propagation method such that the influence of optical confinement on the dynamic response of VCSELs can be evaluated. However, detailed investigation of the transient response of heat and electrical properties is avoided in the self-consistent calculation. This is because the time variation of heat and voltage, which are related to heat and the Poisson equations, is much slower than that of photon density and carrier concentration. This assumption significantly reduces the computation time of the model without sacrificing the accuracy of the calculation. The influence of various transportation mechanisms inside the quantum well (QW) active region on the dynamic response of VCSELs is also discussed in this chapter. The methods used to evaluate the spontaneous emission and linewidth of VCSELs are described in Chapter 8. Simple models have been developed to study these parameters quantitatively through the investigation of the spontaneous emission factor and linewidth enhancement factor. On the other hand, the magnitude of the spontaneous emission factor and linewidth enhancement factor is evaluated using rate equation model by empirically fitting the measurable data. Hence, design criteria to optimize the spontaneous emission of VCSELs are obtained. Other nonlinear features of VCSELs such as self-sustained pulsation, bistability, dual-wavelength operation, and wavelength tunability are studied in Chapter 9 using rate equation models. The advantage of using simple rate equation models is that the parameters that describe the nonlinear behavior of VCSELs can be easily extracted through some measurable data such as injection current and lasing power. In conclusion, this book presents the most effective way to implement laser models of VCSELs, which the reader can easily understand. However, the readers are assumed to have the usual undergraduate background knowledge of electromagnetic theory and solid-state physics as well as basic computational skills. Materials of this research monograph concentrate on the evaluation of modeling techniques to analyze VCSELs under various operating conditions. As each chapter of this book is mostly independent of the other chapters, readers can selectively study any chapter for their own interest. Although this book is of most interest to the design engineer of VCSELs, it also provides valuable information to CAD tool designers in other fields of semiconductor lasers. Siu Fung Yu Singapore |
Chapter 2 - Simple Design Consideration of Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers
| CHAPTER 2 Simple Design Consideration of Vertical Cavity Surface Emitting Lasers In this chapter, the simple design methodology of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) under the criteria of minimum threshold current, maximum electronic conversion (current : gain) ratio as well as maximum wallplug (electrical-to-optical) efficiency are described. The corresponding design equations for VCSELs with uniform and periodic gain structures are derived for the investigation. Hence, the detailed structure of lasers can be determined for optimal performance at and above threshold operation. 2.1 INTRODUCTION Vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) have optical cavities orthogonal to those of conventional facet emitting lasers [1 3]. This simple arrangement in the orientation of cavity significantly improves the output performance and fabrication flexibility of semiconductor lasers [4]. The main advantages of VCSELs over conventional facet emitting lasers are
Hence, VCSELs are considered as the key components in optical fiber communications, optical interconnection systems, and optical parallel processing systems. Because of the difference between VCSELs and conventional facet emitting lasers in cavity orientation, the design consideration of facet emitting lasers may not be applied to the analysis of VCSELs. For example, the requirement of high longitudinal side-mode suppression is the major concern in the design of facet emitting lasers [7,8] but is neglected in VCSELs [4] because of the latter s extremely short cavity length. Furthermore, in facet emitting lasers, maximum wallplug (electrical-to-optical) efficiency is achieved by enhancing the transverse confinement factor (i.e., overlap between transverse field profile and optical gain) [7,8], but that is realized in VCSELs with an optimal longitudinal confinement factor (i.e., overlap between longitudinal standing wave and optical gain) [9,10]. In addition, diffraction loss, self-heating, and high reflectivity (>0.95), which are the unique characteristics of VCSELs [11 16], need to be taken into consideration in the design of high-performance VCSELs. By contrast, diffraction loss and self-heating are usually ignored in the design of facet emitting lasers [7,8]. So, it can be concluded that the design criteria of VCSELs are quite different from those of facet emitting lasers. In this chapter, the design methodology of VCSELs for optimal electrical and optical performance is discussed. The design equations for VCSELs with uniform and periodic gain structure are derived to optimize the corresponding threshold current density and differential quantum efficiency. In addition, the use of the quantum-well (QWs) active layer to enhance the steady-state performance of VCSELs is studied. It is shown that the design criteria of VCSELs are different from those of facet emitting lasers such as the requirement of extremely high reflectivity. Hence, equations for analysis and design of high-reflectivity multilayered mirrors are also given. Furthermore, the abovementioned threshold characteristics of VCSELs are optimized by analyzing the corresponding wallplug eficiency with the parasitic resistance and leakage current factored into the analysis. |
Design and fabrication of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) requires an iterative process, which is extremely expensive and time-consuming. The use of computer-aided design (CAD) tools can help shorten the design cycle and speed up the development process. Laser models, which are found in the literature, can be used to implement CAD tools for the analysis and design of VCSELs. However, some comprehensive models, which perform sophisticated functions, are difficult to implement and show low computational efficiency. Other simplified models exhibit high computing speed but deliver inadequate descriptions of the observed effects. As a result, inconsistent conclusions may be obtained because different assumptions are applied. This book attempts to provide a guideline for the derivation of models based on appropriate assumptions for a particular problem so that the phenomena observed by the experiment can be easily explained. In fact, the objective throughout this book is to search for the simplest and most direct treatment for modeling VCSELs. The author believes that the laser models covered in this book can help the readers customize their CAD tools to fit into their applications. In addition, the readers should have no difficulty in implementing their own laser models.
TABLE OF CONTENTS