| PREFACE
The book is divided into nine chapters. Except for the first two introductory chapters, each chapter is independent and restricted to a particular subject to be studied. To the best of the author s knowledge, the most appropriate theories have been chosen to model the specific topic of VCSELs. In Chapters 3 and 4, theoretical models have been developed to analyze the modal profile and polarization, respectively, of VCSELs. The most popular structure of VCSELs is a cylindrical symmetric cavity, which is assumed in the derivation of the models. In addition, this configuration of VCSELs allows investigation of the modal profile and polarization separately such that the complexity of theoretical models can be reduced. In Chapter 3, different methods of solving the wave equation for the modal profile of VCSELs are discussed in detail. The reader can choose the most appropriate model with the required speed and accuracy to analyze the problems. In Chapter 4, two- and four-level models are described to study the polarization properties of the fundamental transverse mode. These simplified models can evaluate the dominant factors that control the polarization properties of VCSELs. It must be noted that the investigation of VCSELs using cold cavity approximations is not realistic. This is so because most of the measurable data, such as threshold current, lasing wavelength, slope efficiency, and output power, all depend on the operating temperature of lasers. Furthermore, the optical behavior of VCSELs is affected by thermal lensing (i.e., self-focusing of transverse modes into the core region of the active layer). Therefore, the thermal properties of VCSELs are investigated in Chapter 5. The method of effective temperature using a simple rate equation model is presented. Effective thermal conductivity and heat generation rate are also derived. The objective in defining effective temperature is to simplify the study by using a rate equation model so that the computational efficiency can be improved. However, this approach will not provide detailed information on heat distribution. Detailed heat distribution inside the laser cavity is studied by solving the heat equation numerically. In this case, the influence of thermal lensing on the optical field profile can be evaluated. Spatial hole burning of carrier concentration also has significant influence on the modal profile of VCSELs. Therefore, Chapter 6 describes the use of a simple rate equation to evaluate the distribution of carrier concentration inside the active region. In this case, self-consistent calculation of optical gain and carrier concentration (i.e., self-consistent calculation of the Poisson and Schrödinger equations) is ignored to simplify the calculation. Different methods for approximating the nonuniform distribution of carrier concentration are also discussed. On the other hand, nonuniform distributions of electric potential and current are required as the input parameters to calculate the heat distribution inside the laser cavity. They have to be solved numerically using the Poisson and continuity equations simultaneously with appropriate boundary conditions. The electric potential across the active layer and the corresponding carrier concentration can be linked together by a simple diode equation. This is so because the simplified relation between optical gain and carrier concentration has been assumed. The self-consistent calculation of optical field, heat, and electrical characteristics of VCSELs is also described in Chapter 6. The dynamic response of VCSELs is analyzed in Chapter 7. Preliminary investigation of the dynamic response of VCSELs using a simple rate equation model is described. Hence, the time variation of carrier concentration and photon density inside the active layer can be calculated. Furthermore, detailed analysis of optical fields can be considered using the beam propagation method such that the influence of optical confinement on the dynamic response of VCSELs can be evaluated. However, detailed investigation of the transient response of heat and electrical properties is avoided in the self-consistent calculation. This is because the time variation of heat and voltage, which are related to heat and the Poisson equations, is much slower than that of photon density and carrier concentration. This assumption significantly reduces the computation time of the model without sacrificing the accuracy of the calculation. The influence of various transportation mechanisms inside the quantum well (QW) active region on the dynamic response of VCSELs is also discussed in this chapter. The methods used to evaluate the spontaneous emission and linewidth of VCSELs are described in Chapter 8. Simple models have been developed to study these parameters quantitatively through the investigation of the spontaneous emission factor and linewidth enhancement factor. On the other hand, the magnitude of the spontaneous emission factor and linewidth enhancement factor is evaluated using rate equation model by empirically fitting the measurable data. Hence, design criteria to optimize the spontaneous emission of VCSELs are obtained. Other nonlinear features of VCSELs such as self-sustained pulsation, bistability, dual-wavelength operation, and wavelength tunability are studied in Chapter 9 using rate equation models. The advantage of using simple rate equation models is that the parameters that describe the nonlinear behavior of VCSELs can be easily extracted through some measurable data such as injection current and lasing power. In conclusion, this book presents the most effective way to implement laser models of VCSELs, which the reader can easily understand. However, the readers are assumed to have the usual undergraduate background knowledge of electromagnetic theory and solid-state physics as well as basic computational skills. Materials of this research monograph concentrate on the evaluation of modeling techniques to analyze VCSELs under various operating conditions. As each chapter of this book is mostly independent of the other chapters, readers can selectively study any chapter for their own interest. Although this book is of most interest to the design engineer of VCSELs, it also provides valuable information to CAD tool designers in other fields of semiconductor lasers. Siu Fung Yu Singapore |
Design and fabrication of vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) requires an iterative process, which is extremely expensive and time-consuming. The use of computer-aided design (CAD) tools can help shorten the design cycle and speed up the development process. Laser models, which are found in the literature, can be used to implement CAD tools for the analysis and design of VCSELs. However, some comprehensive models, which perform sophisticated functions, are difficult to implement and show low computational efficiency. Other simplified models exhibit high computing speed but deliver inadequate descriptions of the observed effects. As a result, inconsistent conclusions may be obtained because different assumptions are applied. This book attempts to provide a guideline for the derivation of models based on appropriate assumptions for a particular problem so that the phenomena observed by the experiment can be easily explained. In fact, the objective throughout this book is to search for the simplest and most direct treatment for modeling VCSELs. The author believes that the laser models covered in this book can help the readers customize their CAD tools to fit into their applications. In addition, the readers should have no difficulty in implementing their own laser models.
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 4.5.3 - Polarization-Resolved Optical Spectra
4.5.3 Polarization-Resolved Optical Spectra It has been noted from (4.109) that the optical phase and intensity of the optical signal are dependent on the dominant  Furthermore, if the amplitude and phase of Fh (t) are assumed constant, the v-mode spectrum, which dominates the polarization dynamic of VCSELs, is given by [48]  where E0 is the n-mode amplitude. As is shown in (4.117), two peaks are observed from the optical spectrum. There is strong peak at ω ≈ — ω0, which corresponds to the "nonlasing υ mode" and a much weaker peak at ω ≈ ω0, which is produced in a polarization type of four-wave mixing (FWM) between the υ mode that peaks at ω ≈ — ω0 and the dominant h mode, which peaks at ω = 0. Furthermore, the intensity of the FWM peak, relative to that of the nonlasing peak, can be used to estimate the effective gain anisotropy and birefringence via [48]  The separation of the two degenerated orthogonal polarizations is due to anisotropies of laser cavity. Hence, the measurement of polarization spectra can be utilized to investigate the anisotropy parameters from the equations derived above. The VCSEL predicted above can be verified easily through experiment. In the experiment, the VCSEL is enclosed in a temperature-stabilized box and driven by a stable current source in order to minimize external noise. The collimated laser light is first passed through a rotatable λ/4 plate and subsequently through a combination of a rotatable λ/2 plate and an optical isolator, which together effectively act as a rotatable polarizer. By setting the angles of the λ/4 and λ/2 plates, the polarization state on which the laser light is projected is selected. The spectrum of the polarized light can be measured using a planar Fabry-Perot interferometer that allows detailed measurement of the optical spectrum. Figure 4.14 shows the measured optical spectrum of the υ-nonlasing mode (peak υ1) of 1.9 mW output power [49]. The h-lasing mode (peak h) is also shown as the dashed curve, which is largely suppressed by a factor of 105. A 100 x magnification clearly shows the presence of another nonlasing peak (peak υ2), which is a four-wave mixing (FWM) signal. The lasing peak is associated with the steady-state polarization of the laser, the nonlasing peak is a result of amplified spontaneous emission in the orthogonal polarization, and the FWM peak results from nonlinear mixing between these two. From (4.117), it is noted that the optical spectra of Figure 4.14 contains information of some laser parameters. First, the frequency difference between the lasing and nonlasing peaks gives the effective birefringence ω0, whereas the difference in their half width at half maximum (HWHM) spectral widths gives the effective loss anisotropy γ0. It is found in Figure 4.14 that the effective birefringence is relatively small at ω0/2π ≈ ±3.4 GHz (i.e., plus sign because the high-frequency mode lases). In addition, the effective loss anisotropy has a more typical value of γ0/2π ≈ 0.38 GHz. The corresponding spectral width of the lasing mode is an instrument limited to 0.06 GHz (HWHM) by resolution of the Fabry-Perot interferometer. It must be noted that for most other VCSELs, ω0/2π ranged between –3 and +15 GHz and γ0 is always below 1 GHz [48]. The relative strength between the FWM peak and the nonlasing peak can be used to quantify the nonlinear anisotropy, γnon(≡ PτJ/(τdτp)), in VCSELs using (4.118). Furthermore, it is found that a combined nonlinear anisotropy of (α2H + l)γ2non = 3.5 ns–1. Hence, it is shown that the polarization fluctuation of VCSELs can be utilized to determine the corresponding intrinsic optical.  Figure 4.14 Polarization-resolved optical spectra of VCSEL at a constant current taking. For the solid curve the lasing h-mode is fully removed from the noisy spectrum and the lasing h-mode spectrum given in the dashed curve is suppressed by a factor of 105, which allows it to serve as a marker. The peaks υ1 and υ2 represent the nonlasing peak and four-wave mixing peak, respectively. (After Ref. 49). |
component of the optical field vector but the 
component of the optical field vector gives the information on the polarization dynamics of the polarized noise. If the 
