Fatal Exit

Chapter 5 - Things Are Further Away in the Dark: December 2002

chapter_5-1.jpg

This vehicle split into hundreds of pieces.

One dark and rainy night I was traveling on a slick road toward the college in Pinehurst, North Carolina where I teach Holocaust Studies. Riding along with me was Dr. Susan Chernyk-Spatz, an Auschwitcz survivor who was scheduled to speak on her experiences. On the way to the college we passed a horrific crash. I lamented to Susan about how often people are injured and killed in motor vehicle crashes. Her response was that "things are further away in the dark." It took me years to understand what she meant.

On December 3-4, 2002, the ninth IEEE Motor Vehicle Event Data Recorder (MVEDR) meeting was conducted at Booz-Allen-Hamilton headquarters in Tyson's Corner, Virginia.1 There were fifty-eight individuals in attendance and several guests including Joan Claybrook of Public Citizen, Professor Michael Edmund O'Neill of George Mason University, and Matthew L. Wald, national correspondent for the New York Times.

At the beginning of the meeting there was an announcement that the Peoples Republic of China was interested in joining our project. Mr. Bao Yong Qiang from the Traffic Management Research Institute of the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China sent a notice that China was working on a vehicle traveling data recorder (VDR). The main function of the Chinese VDR is speed and measurement, distance measurement, monitoring driving activities, displaying, printing, data storage, data downloading and uploading and downloading and uploading protocol. The copyright of this standard belongs to the Standardization Administration of China (SAC).

A recent study (2003) conducted by the National Academy of Engineering titled "Personal Cars and China" notes that:

In 1991 the Chinese government published its eighth five-year plan (1991-1995), which designated the automotive industry as a "pillar industry" that would drive the economy in the twenty-first century. Accordingly, in its most recent five-year plan for the Chinese automotive industry (2001-2005), the government stated that its immediate goal is to produce over 1 million cars a year.2

At present, China has relatively few motor vehicles per capita and, of the cars on its highways, few are privately owned. In 2001 China had 18 million vehicles, of which 5 million were cars. If China's number of motor vehicles per capita were comparable to the world average, its fleet would have to total 160 million, with 10 million new and replacement vehicles acquired each year.3

109,363 people died on China's roads in 2002. This fatality figure is more than double the number of people killed on U.S. highways annually. In 2002, traffic crashes accounted for 79% of China's accidental deaths. In the first ten months of 2003, traffic crashes killed 86,000 people and seriously injured an additional 418,000.

China's love affair with automobiles is turning dangerous. The explosion in the number of new cars and new drivers is creating havoc on the roads. Besides resorting to tougher rules, new emission standards, and new national traffic laws, the Chinese would greatly benefit from incorporating event data recorder technology in vehicles.

At the end of the December 4th meeting, the host from Booz-Allen-Hamilton suggested that two of the three sub working groups be grandfathered. His view was that we were over-reaching. He lost the argument but gained the attention of those that were interested in seeing it happen.

NHTSA began receiving comments to Docket NHTSA-2002-13546 on November 19, 2002.4 By October 1, 2003 approximately 82 responses were posted on the USDOT website titled "Docket Management System."5

This chapter provides an overview of the comments received. It does not include all the comments, for to do so would require a much larger book. However, if you want to read the entire docket, it is available through the footnotes and the Docket Management System (DMS) website; you may also refer to the footnotes for more information.

It is important to note that I was "selective" in choosing what docket submissions to include, and even "more selective" in the amount of text that I included from each docket. In some cases I chose to submit everything and in others I simply tried to capture the essence of the submission and only included partial text. My objective was to be objective and provide you (the reader) with an overview of the issues. Once again, the footnotes will direct you to the entire submission if you wish for a fuller understanding.

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Data Acquisition Systems and Instruments
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.