Phase Conjugate Laser Optics

Chapter 5.6 - Summary And Conclusions

5.6   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

In this chapter, a number of design issues have been described that are important to
the successful operation of a high-average-power amplifier system incorporating an
SBS phase conjugate mirror. Although the operation of a solid-state laser system
with high pulse energies offers unique challenges, we believe that there are valuable
design principles that have arisen from this work that are very relevant to high-average-
power SBS phase-conjugated lasers in general. Of these, the key
considerations can be summarized as follows:

  1. The amplifier design should minimize the thermally induced distortions by
    maintaining very uniform pumping and cooling. We believe the optimal
    amplifier architecture for solid-state amplifiers which minimizes optical
    distortions and depolarization continues to be the zigzag slab.
  2. The multi-pass extraction geometry should be completely image relayed to
    maintain a uniform irradiance spatial profile in the amplifier, to avoid loss of
    aberrated components of the beam wavefront before reaching the phase


    Figure 5.38. A pointing scatter plot measured for 100 pulses at 1 Hz for the 527-nm output beam demonstrating effective and consistent phase-locking between the four beamlets. The 2s fluctuation of 4.4 mrad in the horizontal, phase-locking dimension is only 2.6% of the 2l/D diameter of a single beamlet at 1053 nm.


    conjugator, and to present a smooth spatial profile to the input of the phase
    conjugator.
  3. The free propagation of the extraction beam should be minimized to reduce
    the irradiance distortions that result from the propagation of diffraction and
    thermal aberrations. The use of a double-passed refractive relay telescope
    places all optical surfaces near the relay image plane in the amplifier slab,
    minimizing potential optical damage problems that can accompany folded
    telescope designs using reflective optics.
  4. The SBS phase conjugator should be operated high above threshold in order to
    ensure the best reproduction of the high-frequency components of irradiance
    and phase. This also results in high-energy reflectivity that minimizes the
    conjugator’s insertion loss into the optical system and results in the accurate
    reproduction of the input temporal profile.
  5. The rise time of the leading edge of the optical extraction pulse should be
    longer than the acoustic relaxation time in the Brillouin medium in order to
    maximize the wavefront reversal fidelity when the conjugator is operated high
    above the stimulated scattering threshold.
  6. The SBS loop geometry not only provides a decreased SBS threshold, but also
    eliminates random temporal phase fluctuations that contribute to increased
    instability in the temporal profile and increased spectral bandwidth. These
    same random phase fluctuations also disrupt the phase-locking of multiple
    beams in a single SBS cell; furthermore, an SBS beam combiner design,
    incorporating the loop geometry, is required for accurate and stable phase-
    locked laser output.

The successful operation of the high-energy laser systems presented in this
chapter demonstrates the fact that SBS phase conjugation has, over the past decade,
advanced beyond the level of an optical curiosity to become a reliable component in
high-average-power laser systems. The most notable improvement in laser
performance resulting from the wavefront correction provided by the conjugator
is the near-diffraction-limited output divergence. However, the phase conjugator
also contributes to the reliability of the amplifier system by greatly reducing the
optical alignment sensitivity and by providing interstage gain isolation between
amplifier passes. Finally, we feel that the detailed considerations required for this
specific amplifier design presented here are applicable, in general, to the design of
high-average-power, high-beam-quality solid-state laser systems using SBS phase
conjugation.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS


The authors would like to recognize the outstanding effort of the technical team at
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory that was involved in the design,
construction, and testing of the laser systems presented here. James Wintemute was
responsible for the design, assembly, and alignment of the optical systems; William
Manning and Steve Telford designed the high-energy pulsers and electronic
controls; and Balbir Bhachu designed and oversaw the mechanical fabrication of the
laser housing, cooling, and vacuum systems. We would like to thank Mary Norton
for the optical design of the high-average-power second harmonic converters, Luis
Zapata for contributions to the design of the Nd:glass zigzag amplifier, and William
Neuman and Mark Hermann for computational support of optical modeling and SBS
numerical simulations. We are also indebted to John Honig for the thermal analysis
of the phase-locked doubler and to John Halpin for his support of the operation of
these laser systems outside the laboratory.

This work is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Howard Powell for his inspiration,
his encouragement, and his unfailing support of high-average-power solid-state laser
development at LLNL.

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy
by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract W-7405-Eng-48.

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Lasers
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.