Matrix Preconditioning Techniques and Applications

A computer (approximate) solution will not satisfy (1.1) exactly so it is of interest to examine the perturbation theory.
Theorem 1.3.5. Let Ax = b and ( A + ? A)( x + ? x)= b + ? b. If A ?1 ? A < 1 , then
| (1.22) | |
The proof of this result is easy once one notes that
Here for our application to iterative solution, ? A is not a major concern but ? b will be reflected in the usual stopping criterion based on residuals. Clearly the condition number ?( A) will be crucial in determining the final solution accuracy as computer arithmetic has a finite machine precision.
Eigenvalue perturbation. We give a brief result on eigenvalues simply for comparison and completeness [218].
Theorem 1.3.6. (Bauer Fike). Let A, X ?
n n and X be nonsingular. For D = diag( ? i ) with ?i = ? i ( A) , let . be one of these norms: 1, 2 or ?, such that
. If B = A + ? A is a perturbed matrix of A and X ?1 AX = D, then all eigenvalues of B are inside the union of n discs
where the discs are defined by
General case : 1,...