Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules, 2nd Edition

Chapter 4: Tuning Rules for PID Controllers

4.1 FOLPD Model

4.1.1 Ideal controller

Table 44: PID controller tuning rules FOLPD model

Rule

K c

T i

T d

Comment

Process reaction

Callender et al. (1935/6).

Model: Method 1

[1]

1.418 ? m

0.353 ? m or 0.47 ? m

=0.3

Ziegler and Nichols (1942).

Model: Method 2

, a [1.2, 2]

2 ? m

0.5 ? m

Quarter decay ratio

Chien et al. (1952) regulator.

Model: Method 2

2.38 ? m

0.42 ? m

0% overshoot;

2 ? m

0.42 ? m

20% overshoot;

Chien et al. (1952) servo.

Model: Method 2

T m

0.5 ? m

0% overshoot;

1.36T m

0.47 ? m

20% overshoot;

Cohen and Coon (1953).

Model: Method 2

[1]K c (178)

T i (178)

Quarter decay ratio.

Three constraints method Murrill (1967) page 356.

Model: Method 5

[2]T d (179)

;

Quarter decay ratio; minimum integral error (servo mode).

str m and H gglund (1988) pages 120 126.

T 90%

0.5 ? m

Model: Method 23

T 90%=90% closed loop step response time (Leeds and Northrup Electromax V controller).

Parr (1989) page 194.

2.5 ? m

0.4 ? m

Model: Method 2

Borresen and Grindal (1990).

3 ? m

0.5 ? m

Model: Method 2

Sain and zgen (1992).

[3]K c (180)

T i (180)

T d (180)

Model: Method 24

Connell (1996) page 214.

Model: Method 2

1.6667 ? m

0.4 ? m

Approximate quarter decay ratio

Hay (1998) pages 197, 198.

Model: Method...

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Mass Spectrometers
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.