Optical Switching

Chapter 3.2.2. - Header Format, Transmission, and Processing

3.2.2   Header Format, Transmission, and Processing

The format of the optical header is another important parameter in the network
design. Packet headers contain the information that is necessary for the node to


FIGURE 3.2 Architecture of a node in (a) a slotted and (b) an unslotted network (contention resolution is not shown in the figure).


perform the switching function and forward the packet towards its destination. Some
of the fields included in the packet header are the packet destination (and possibly
origin), its priority, and a sequence number (in case packets need to be reordered
at the egress router). Additional information (extra fields) in the header may assist
in traffic engineering and management operations but there is a trade-off with the
bandwidth that will be required to transmit the header and the speed at which it
can be processed [2].

Figure 3.3 depicts a switching timeslot that includes the header, the payload,
and the necessary guard bands before and after the payload. The sample header


FIGURE 3.3 A generic packet format in a synchronous OPS network.


is similar to the one proposed in the project KEOPS (Section 3.8) includes the
following fields:

  • delineation and synchronization bits;
  • source label identifying the ingress edge node address;
  • destination label identifying the egress edge node address;
  • packet-type field to identify traffic nature/priorities;
  • packet sequence number to reorder data if out-of-sequence arrival of packets
    occurs;
  • an operation, administration, and maintenance (OAM) field; and
  • a header error correction field.

Regarding the transmission of the optical header, three approaches have been
presented [2]:

  • Subcarrier multiplexing [7]. In this approach, a low-bandwidth header is
    placed on an electrical subcarrier above the baseband frequencies occupied
    by the packet payload, and both packet and header are transmitted in the
    same timeslot. This enables header retrieval with a photodetector without the
    use of an optical filter. This approach features several advantages, such as
    the fact that the header interpretation process can take up the whole payload
    transmission time, but also puts a possible limit on the payload data rate. If
    the payload data rate is increased, the baseband will expand and might eventually
    overlap with the subcarrier frequency, which is limited by microwave
    electronics.
  • Transmission on a separate wavelength. In this approach, the header and
    payload are transmitted on separate wavelengths and demultiplexed at the
    node input using passive optical filters. Because the headers are decoupled
    from the packets in this case, they are also referred to as out-of-band
    headers. The advantage of transmitting the headers on a separate control wavelength
    is that the control plane is implemented and managed independently. On
    the other hand, when the data and headers are carried in separate wavelengths,
    the synchronization between them is hard to maintain; phenomena such as
    chromatic dispersion will separate the two components and each node will
    require delay compensation to realign the header and payload. As with subcarrier
    multiplexing, this method may also suffer from crosstalk as the payload and
    header are transmitted in parallel [2].
  • Serial transmission. In this approach, the header is transmitted just before the
    packet on the same wavelength; a guard band is placed between the header and
    payload to allow for the removal and reinsertion of the header at intermediate
    OPS nodes. The header (usually at a lower bit rate) is removed by gating an
    optical switch at the appropriate time [2].

These three approaches for header–packet transmission are depicted in Figure 3.4.

The retrieval and update of packet headers are typically performed using electronics.
So far, because of the immature state of optical processing technologies,
there have not been operational solutions that can maintain the header in optical
form throughout the reading and updating process in order to avoid optical to electrical
conversions and increase the processing speed. All-optical header processing
is up to now limited to experimental demonstrations of optical retrievals and updates
of small packet headers.

The technical difficulties in the optical header update process suggest that at
present it may be more realistic to consider a simplified form of optical packet
switching where the headers are very short and the routing decisions are simple
and straightforward. This approach could in the future evolve to some form of
all-optical label swapping (AOLS) [8]. In this case, instead of forwarding the
packet based on information contained in the packet header, all decisions are
made based on a small optical label that is attached to the packet when it enters
the optical core. This label is retrieved and updated at each intermediate node
without optical to electrical conversions. Challenges in AOLS include the optical
components that will perform the actual label swapping, as well as the format and
meaning of optical labels.

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Fiber Optic Cables
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.