Preface
The first generation of fiber-optic communication systems debuting in 1980 operated at a meager bit rate of 45 Mb/s and required signal regeneration every 10 km or so. However, by 1990 further advances in lightwave technology not only increased the bit rate to 10 Gb/s (by a factor of 200) but also allowed signal regeneration after 80 km or more. The pace of innovation in all fields of lightwave technology only quickened during the 1990s, as evident from the development and commercialization of erbium-doped fiber amplifiers, fiber Bragg gratings, and wavelength-division-multiplexed lightwave systems. By 2001, the capacity of commercial terrestrial systems exceeded 1.6 Tb/s. At the same time, the capacity of transoceanic lightwave systems installed worldwide exploded. A single transpacific system could transmit information at a bit rate of more than 1 Tb/s over a distance of 10,000 km without any signal regeneration. Such a tremendous improvement was possible only because of multiple advances in all areas of lightwave technology. Although commercial development slowed down during the economic downturn that began in 2001, it was showing some signs of recovery by the end of 2004, and lightwave technology itself has continued to grow. The primary objective of this two-volume book is to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date account of all major aspects of lightwave technology. The first volume, subtitled Components and Devices, is devoted to a multitude of silica- and semiconductor-based optical devices. The second volume, subtitled Telecommunication Systems, deals with the design of modern lightwave systems; the acronym LT1 is used to refer to the material in the first volume. The first two introductory chapters cover topics such as modulation formats and multiplexing techniques employed to form an optical bit stream. Chapters 3 through 5 consider the degradation of such an optical signal through loss, dispersion, and nonlinear effects during its transmission through optical fibers and how they affect the system performance. Chapters 6 through 8 focus on the management of the degradation caused by noise, dispersion, and fiber nonlinearity. Chapters 9 and 10 cover the engineering issues related to the design of WDM systems and optical networks. This text is intended to serve both as a textbook and a reference monograph. For this reason, the emphasis is on physical understanding, but engineering aspects are also discussed throughout the text. Each chapter also includes selected problems that can be assigned to students. The book's primary readership is likely to be graduate students, research scientists, and professional engineers working in fields related to lightwave technology. An attempt is made to include as much recent material as possible so that students are exposed to the recent advances in this exciting field. The reference section at the end of each chapter is more extensive than what is common for a typical textbook. The listing of recent research papers should be helpful to researchers using this book as a reference. At the same time, students can benefit from this feature if they are assigned problems requiring reading of the original research papers. This book may be useful in an upper-level graduate course devoted to optical communications. It can also be used in a two-semester course on optoelectronics or lightwave technology. A large number of persons have contributed to this book either directly or indirectly. It is impossible to mention all of them by name. I thank my graduate students and the students who took my course on optical communication systems and helped improve my class notes through their questions and comments. I am grateful to my colleagues at the Institute of Optics for numerous discussions and for providing a cordial and productive atmosphere. I thank, in particular, Renè Essiambre and Qiang Lin for reading several chapters and providing constructive feedback. Last, but not least, I thank my wife Anne and my daughters, Sipra, Caroline, and Claire, for their patience and encouragement. Govind P. Agrawal Rochester, NY |
Chapter 9.6.1 - Spectral Efficiency
9.6.1 Spectral EfficiencyAn important issue is related to the enhancement of spectral efficiency of dense WDM systems as much as possible. As discussed in Section 9.1.1, the spectral efficiency is defined as ηs = B/Δvch, where B is the single-channel bit rate and Δvch is the channel spacing. Most commercial WDM systems in 2004 were operating with ηs ≤ 0.2 (b/s)/Hz, as they were designed to transmit 10-Gb/s channels with a spacing of 50 GHz or more. Many laboratory experiments have shown that WDM systems whose channels operate at 40 Gb/s with a spacing of 100 GHz can be designed to realize system capacities of more than 2 Tb/s with a spectral efficiency of 0.4 (b/s)/Hz. Such a 50-channel system occupies a bandwidth of 5 THz (around 40 nm near 1.55 µm) that covers the entire C band. Any increase in the capacity requires either the use of both the C and L bands or a reduction in channel spacing. For this reason, several experiments transmitted 40-Gb/s channels with a spacing of 50 GHz, resulting in a spectral efficiency of 0.8 (b/s)/Hz. Such WDM systems either employ modulation formats that are different than the standard RZ and NRZ formats or prefilter the optical signal at the transmitter end using an optical filter [135]-[142]. The idea behind prefiltering is simple. An optical bit stream generated by modulating an optical carrier has a symmetric spectrum with multiple peaks separated by a frequency equal to the bit rate. Since the left and right sidebands contain redundant information, one can borrow a technique from the microwave technology known as vestigial sideband (VSB) transmission, and launch only one of the sidebands into the fiber link. This technique has been used for NRZ-format WDM systems by filtering the signal spectrum with an optical filter that is detuned from the center by an optimum amount [141]. Figure 9.27(a) shows the location of filter passband (dashed curve) superimposed on the the spectrum of a 40-Gb/s NRZ bit stream. The penalty curve and the eye patterns for several detunings show that the optimum detuning is around 20 GHz for a 30-GHz bandwidth filter. It turns out that the suppressed sideband can be reconstructed partially during transmission by the nonlinear effects occurring within the fiber link. An alternative scheme transmits the whole spectrum but employs an optical filter at the receiver end to select only one sideband. The spectral efficiency is enhanced in this scheme by using a channel allocation pattern as shown in Figure 9.27(b). Rather than using a constant channel spacing, it is alternated between 50 and 75 GHz for successive 40-Gb/s channels, resulting in a spectral efficiency of 0.64 (b/s)/Hz. At the receiver end, channels are selected with a 30-GHz filter that is detuned by 20 GHz or so toward the 75 GHz-spaced neighboring channel. With this arrangement, one always selects the sideband experiencing the smallest overlap with adjacent channels. This scheme was used as early as 2000 to transmit 128 channels at 40 Gb/s over 300 km, resulting in a system capacity of 5.12 Tb/s [141]. In later experiments, link length could be increased to around 1,500 km with the use of FEC, even though the effective bit rate of each channel increased to 42.7 Gb/s.
Figure 9.27: (a) Measured power penalty (thick solid curve) as a function of filter detuning (top inset) and eye diagrams at four values of detuning, (b) Measured spectra of filtered channels at the receiver end when channels are alternatively spaced by 50 and 75 GHz. (After Ref. [141]; ©2004 IEEE.)
In the case of RZ format, the channel bandwidth can be reduced to some extent by employing the CSRZ format (see Section 2.3.3) in which phases of the neighboring pulses in an optical bit stream differ by π. The carrier is suppressed for such a bit stream, and the two dominant spectral peaks are located at v0± B/2, rather than at v0± B, where v0 is the carrier frequency and B is the channel bit rate. This feature allows considerable filtering of the signal before it is launched into the optical filter, while still retaining both sidebands. Figure 9.28 shows in several situations the effects of filtering on the spectrum of a 40-Gb/s channel modulated with the CSRZ format [142]. The eye diagrams recorded under back-to-back conditions (no fiber) are also shown. When the filter passband was centered at the carrier frequency (symmetric filtering), even a 68-GHz filter produced an almost 3-dB penalty in the measured Q factor. In contrast, the penalty was below 1.5 dB even for a 35-GHz filter, detuned off-center by an optimum amount (asymmetric filtering). In a 2002 experiment, a spectral efficiency of 1 (b/s)/Hz was realized with asymmetric filtering by transmitting 25 channels at 40 Gb/s, resulting in a capacity of 1 Tb/s. By 2003, a 5.12-Tb/s WDM signal (128 channels at 40 Gb/s per channel) was transmitted over 1,280 km by filtering each 42.7-Gb/s CSRZ bit stream (with 7% FEC overhead) with a 50-GHz optical filter [137]. Each channel was launched with -4 dBm of average power, and neighboring channels were orthogonally polarized to reduce interchannel crosstalk.
Figure 9.28: Effect of optical filtering on channel spectra and eye patterns: (a) unfiltered case; (b) symmetric 68-GHz filter; (c) symmetric 35-GHz filter; (d) asymmetric 68-GHz filter; (e) asymmetric 35-GHz filter. (After Ref. [142]; ©2004 IEEE.)
Several experiments have used the DPSK format for transmitting 40-Gb/s channels with 50-GHz channel spacing to realize a spectral efficiency of 0.8 (b/s)/Hz. In one experiment, 160 channels at 42.7 Gb/s (capacity 6.4 Tb/s) were transmitted over 3200 km of fiber [138]. Figure 9.29 shows the experimental setup schematically. Each 100-km section had a dispersion of 7.5 ps/(nm-km) and a dispersion slope of 0.039 ps/(nm2-km). Its loss was compensated through Raman amplification, while its accumulated dispersion was compensated using a DCF such that residual dispersion after one round trip in a 400-km recirculating loop was below 0.03 ps/(nm-km) for all channels. Two dynamic gain equalizers were used to maintain nearly equal power for all channels after each round trip inside the loop. It was necessary to employ FEC coding to ensure a corrected BER of less than 10-12 after 3,200 km. The capacity-distance product exceeded 20 (Pb/s)-km for this experiment.
Figure 9.29: Experimental setup for the CSRZ-DPSK system with a 6.4-Tb/s capacity. PC: polarization controller; GE: gain-equalizing filter; RP: Raman pump; MZDI: Mach-Zehnder delay interferometer; WGR: waveguide grating router. (After Ref. [138]; ©2004 IEEE.)
where SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver. If we assume that Δfch is nearly equal to the bit rate B and define the capacity per unit bandwidth as
we find that ηc for a linear channel can be increased beyond 1 (b/s)/Hz without an upper bound, as long as SNR is made large enough, even though ηs = B/Δvch remains below 1 (b/s)/Hz. Sometimes, ηc is referred to as the spectral efficiency [148], and ηs is called the bandwidth utilization factor.
Figure 9.30: Spectral efficiency as a function of input power density. Solid lines show the limitation set by XPM or FWM; dashed lines are obtained in the absence of nonlinear effects. Information is coded in both the intensity and phase for the curves marked unconstrained. (After Ref. [148]; ©2004 IEEE.)
In practice, a spectral efficiency of at most 1 (b/s)/Hz can be realized when a binary modulation scheme is employed. The use of polarization multiplexing can increase this value, but the enhancement is limited because of the difficulty in recovering a polarization-coded bit stream at the receiver end. Nevertheless, a value of 1.28 (b/s)/Hz has been realized with polarization multiplexing [141]. Larger values of ηc are possible if multilevel signaling is employed. A spectral efficiency of 1.6 (b/s)/Hz was realized in a 2003 experiment in which a format known as differential quadrature PSK (or DQPSK) was employed in combination with polarization multiplexing [150]. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS 


