Metal Forming: Mechanics and Metallurgy, Third Edition

Chapter 8: Upper-Bound Analysis

Calculation of exact forces to cause plastic deformation in metal forming processes is often difficult. Exact solutions must be both statically and kinematically admissible. That means they must be geometrically self-consistent as well as satisfying the required stress equilibrium everywhere in the deforming body. Frequently it is simpler to use limit theorems that allow one to make analyses that result in calculated forces that are known to be either correct or higher or lower than the exact solution.

Lower bounds are based on satisfying stress equilibrium, while ignoring geometric self-consistency. They give forces that are known to be either too low or correct. As such they can assure that a structure is safe. Conditions in which ?=0 are lower bounds. Upper-bound analyses, on the other hand, predict stress or forces that are known to be too large. These are usually more important in metal forming. Upper bounds are based on satisfying yield criteria and geometric self-consistency. No attention is paid to satisfying equilibrium.

8.1 UPPER BOUNDS

The upper-bound theorem states that any estimate of the forces to deform a body made by equating the rate of internal energy dissipation to the external forces will equal or be greater than the correct force. The method of analysis is to

  1. Assume an internal flow field that will produce the shape change;

  2. Calculate the rate at which energy is consumed by this flow field; and

  3. Calculate the external force by equating the rate of external work with...

UNLIMITED FREE
ACCESS
TO THE WORLD'S BEST IDEAS

SUBMIT
Already a GlobalSpec user? Log in.

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.

Customize Your GlobalSpec Experience

Category: Butterfly Valves
Finish!
Privacy Policy

This is embarrasing...

An error occurred while processing the form. Please try again in a few minutes.